Loving MY LOVE


by

Sunday, August 15, 2010


Hey there True Believers, welcome to Comics Comics weekend edition. This one is for those of us who love Romita, Colan, Colletta, Buscema, Ayers – the late ’60s Marvel Bullpen essentially. Maybe you’re like me and love all these artists but maybe you get a little tired of reading the same old reprints over and over again, right? Well, the doctor is here with the cure. It’s called My Love.

A re-vamp of the old school Romance comics published in the ’50s and ’60s, My Love was a late ’60s update with the Marvel Bullpen in full swing (It was also a Marvel romance title from 1949 that turned into Two Gun Western at issue #5). Generally, when people think of Romance comics they think of the classic ’40s-’50s vibe or maybe the gawdy but sharp Charltons of the ’70s. But My Love slips right in between there. It has the innocence of Laugh-in with that bright, morning fresh hippie vibe of the late ’60s AND the beginnings of the lurid, graphic ’70s. That’s how I see it anyhow.

Basically, there seemed to be formula for each issue: two new stories and a reprint from an older Marvel romance comic. Many of the earlier issues of My Love have reprints from older Marvel (Timely, Atlas) ’50s and ’60s material and it’s interesting to see the different framing styles employed in each era. My Love #9 (1970) has two stories drawn by Vince Colletta that look like reprints from a mid-’60s comic. How do I know? Well, it doesn’t say that they’re reprints but the fashions tell me so as well as the framing style. Colletta employs a very conservative and static “camera” compared to the “free and easy” Gene Colan story’s layouts and fashion in the same issue.

Steranko’s famous “My Heart Broke in Hollywood” from Our Love Story #5 (1970) is reprinted in My Love #23 (1973) and it’s interesting to see how the graphics and fashion of ’69-’70 clash somewhat with the other stories and ads in the 1973 reprint. This might be my favorite aspect of this series: How this newsstand mag packaged fashion to girls in the late ’60s/early ’70s. For example, Steranko’s story depicted 1969 styles, a kind of hopeful, flowery & bright world – and in the reprint what follows that story is a grim & gritty story about a black couple who are squarely set in early ’70s realism. Besides the reflection of “society” at large changing there’s also a reflection of it in the artwork itself. Colan’s story is dark and heavy in tone with lots of shadows beautifully inked by John Romita while Steranko’s story is an exercise in light and color. The times were a-changin’, eh?

Try and track these little beauties down, True Believers. These little comics have been quite elusive over the years to your faithful narrator. Seems these comics are popular with art director types and graphic designers. Folks who aren’t necessarily comics fans snatch these babies up and lock them away. I rarely see them floating around in the bins. Often I see them encased in jeweled plastic behind the counter cuz most shop keepers know they can jack up the price and sit on them until an art director type comes along. Some of this stuff has been reprinted in trades like the Steranko story but most of it is stuff I’ve never seen before.

Think of it: a treasure trove of stories about cute girls drawn by your favorite combination of Marvel Bullpen artist team. Buscema and Giacoia. Colan and Romita. Heck and Ayers. Mix and match, keep looking & you’ll find a combination you’ll like, I guarantee it. What I find really interesting is thinking about how much fun these guys must have had on these stories. I’m imagining that the stories were a welcome change from the superhero genre. I imagine they liked being able to draw more of the real world and it seems to show in the backgrounds and in the clothes that the characters are wearing. In most Marvel superhero mags, the backgrounds are reduced to rooftops & laboratories and the characters are wearing costumes. Here in these romance stories the reverse takes hold. The backgrounds and the clothes vary wildly. Location and fashion demand it.

Taking a cue from Brother Hodler, I think I might try and do a series of posts about My Love. Each issue is great and I’d love to track down and review each one. I’ve got enough issues for a good series and I think it’d be fun to study ye olde bullpen without having to riff on Morbius. Lots can be learned from a study of the early ’70s Marvel house style and I’m sure I can lean on the support of our faithful readers to clue me in when I miss a beat. So, until we get started in the weeks to come, check out this Romita story from My Love #1. It’s a killer. (Scroll down, the blog’s title page may confuse you). Got it? Get it. Over and out.

Labels: , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Loving MY LOVE”
  1. DerikB says:

    “(It was also a Marvel romance title from 1949 that turned into Two Gun Western at issue #5)”

    That’s says so much about the comics industry right there in that sentence.

  2. patrick ford says:

    There was a nice trade paperback from a few years ago called “Marvel Romance” which collected a bunch of the late 60’s Marvel Romance stories with art by Romita, Heck, Buscema, Jim Starlin, Gene Colan, and Steranko.
    The Steranko job is interesting. As Steranko tells it Stan Lee rejected a horror job Steranko had completed.
    Incredible if you consider some of the third rate schlock Marvel published in it’s late 60’s “horror” comics.
    Apparently Steranko was paid up front for the rejected story, and owed Marvel something in it’s place if he didn’t want to see Stan, and his henchmen Romita, and Severin transplant a criminal brain into the body of Steranko’s story, not to mention “teddy bear face” plastic surgery on the art.
    Steranko proposed a Western; Stan Lee rejected the idea saying Westerns didn’t sell well enough to justify Steranko’s page rate, but Stan was okay with a Romance story.
    The presence of some of Marvel’s top artists in these late 60’s Romance stories would seem to indicate that they must have been pretty good in the sales department.

  3. Daniel C. Parmenter says:

    Yeah, the “Marvel Romance” tpb was pretty cool, and had a lot of good Vince Colletta inking! One odd inclusion was an early Rich Buckler job! Good article Frank, nice to have some historical context. There was also the rather unfortunate “Marvel Romance Redux” tpb with new, campy dialogue. Ugh.

  4. Brandon Graham says:

    I’d be thrilled to read more of your take on these.

    The womans helmet on that Buscema page reminds me of 70’s xman Sunfire.
    Too bad it’s lee writing and not some serious dude like Roy Thomas.
    It’d be so cool to see the Conan teams take on 70’s romance.

    “As she drove her words cleave flesh from bone– and something falls heavily to the earth…”

  5. mateo says:

    Hey Frank-

    What do you think of those photo-realist strips from the fifties- the Alex Raymond and Stan Drake stuff specifically? I know you have a real distaste for photo-ref art, and some of these guys, Stan Drake in particular, used photos extensively. Drake even talked about how he used to buy Poloroid film “by the case”, and about how he traced photos and old illos of pretty girls until he found out “what made them beautiful”. Since you mention the delights of looking at great artists drawing cute girls, I am simply curious.

    • I like that stuff. Not my favorite stuff, but I respect it. Those guys knew how to use photos… and were trained illustrators.

      • Dan Nadel says:

        Not that anyone’s asking, but I am infatuated with that stuff right now. Drake managed to make great cartooning from that kind of drawing. And oh man, Kelly Green… So good.

        • patrick ford says:

          Great interview with Stan Drake:
          http://www.drake.org/Stan/CarPro86/Article.html
          An excerpt:
          Drake: Strangely enough, I really am a cartoonist – I had to work hard at drawing straight, illustrative type stuff. I started out with Johnstone & Cushing (the advertising cartoon firm) right after the war and my bent was really towards the semi-funny stuff. So I had to learn how to do ‘Juliet Jones’ because they wanted an illustrative strip. I had to work hard at becoming an illustrator. Being funny with my pencil actually is the real me!
          When I got into advertising, an art director told me, “If you want to make out in this business, you must learn how to draw pretty girls and handsome men.” So I recall that I bought copies of ‘Vogue’, ‘Harpers Bazaar’ and ‘Mademoiselle’, and when I got home, I’d place some vellum over the heads of the pretty girls in the magazines, and I must have traced seven or eight hundred heads in this way. Every night I’d practice drawing pretty girls and handsome guys and finally I got to the point where I knew what made a face pretty and what the proportions were. Soon I was drawing them without having to trace them.
          Hurd: And now let’s get into our topic for today–about all of what was involved when you got the job of drawing ‘Blondie’.
          Drake: First of all, I had to copy, I had to make my drawings look like the ones done by Jim Raymond who, in my opinion, was a genius. In a situation like this, you’re forging another man’s handwriting. It took me a year to become comfortable with the strip. In the beginning, of course, I had to get the strip out using a combination of a light box, enlarger and a copy machine.
          It’s been fortunate that I’ve been able to adapt and now go back to the action and the little fun stuff that I love and forget all the folds and all the shading I had to learn in the illustrative game over the years. What ltm doing in ‘Blondie’ is what I always wanted to do.

        • DerikB says:

          I just finished read volumes 2 and 3 of the new Juliet Jones reprints, Drake’s art is so great. And the stories are surprisingly good (better than I expected them to be), they always seem to take a slightly different turn than I expect.

          The Kelly Green books are odd. You get the feeling Drake and Starr wanted to do something more “adult”, yet didn’t want to go too far.

  6. phil says:

    there really should be a weekly column on CC called Dear Frankie, like Dear Abby ya know…

  7. I am an avid collector of romance comics — though primarily the DC ones. I have covered some of the Marvel stories on my blog devoted solely to romance, Sequential Crush!

    Here are a few posts on Marvel that you may enjoy!

    http://sequentialcrush.blogspot.com/2009/05/can-you-spot-differences.html

    http://sequentialcrush.blogspot.com/2009/09/no-man-is-my-master-my-loves-portrayal.html

    http://sequentialcrush.blogspot.com/2010/02/i-failed-at-love.html

    One of my readers sent me your way — I will be sure to add you to my blogroll! 🙂 Looking forward to more romance posts!

  8. seth hurley says:

    that Marvel Romance book collects Love Romance #89 & 101, 102, 103, 104; My Love #2, 14, 16, 18, 19, 20; Teen-Age Romance #77 & 84, Our Love Story #5, and Patsy Walker #119.

    some more love links:

    Our Love Story #1

    http://grantbridgestreet.blogspot.com/2009/10/but-oh-my-lonely-nights-by-stan-lee-and.html

    Our Love Story #2, 27, & 28

    http://diversionsofthegroovykind.blogspot.com/2009/03/in-spring-young-mans-fancy-turns-to_23.html

    My Love #6

    http://grantbridgestreet.blogspot.com/2010/08/my-song-and-my-sorrow-by-stan-lee-and.html

    My Love #2

    http://diversionsofthegroovykind.blogspot.com/2009/05/stan-lee-john-buscema-and-dick-ayers.html

Leave a Reply